Ha....well said Aguest...
still thinking
JoinedPosts by still thinking
-
9
Resolution on JW Case in France
by Blind Willie McTell ineuropean court of human rights vindicates jehovahs witnesses in france the european court of human rights published its unanimous ruling in our favour against the french government's demand for 60% tax on donations back dated to 1993-1996 for $79 million.
this will have great implications for other european countries who would like to do the same thing to us and effectively stop our work.
they sought to obligate the association of jehovahs witnesses of france to pay 58 million euros (over $82,000,000 us), which far exceeds all the assets of the association.
-
-
-
36
Bad day in Athiest/Jehovah's-Witnessville
by Nickolas inbear with me for a day or two, ok?
if i don't vent a bit i'll leave gray matter spontaneously spattered all over my office walls..
-
-
still thinking
Hi Nick, I also have a very intense mother in law...she is not a JW but his parents have been involved in a few cults over the years. Ironically, the last one was headed by an ex JW...control freak woman. They are very loving....but VERY intense.
Because I love their son, nothing they could do would scare me away. I am assuming your son is not a JW or he wouldn't be living with the girl. It is just an excuse for a relationship that wasn't going to work anyway.
There is a limit to what you can blame on your wife....and this one I'm don't think is fair...unless she said she was going to move in with them or something..then the girl might be a bit worried.
-
482
Chemtrails, Seeing is believing.
by pedal power inbefore i begin, i want you to know i understand the difference between chemtrails and contrails, so lets leave those discussions behind, chemtrails exist.. what is the purpose of chemtrails ?
if it was to artificially create clouds, why come to edinburgh ?
for any of you who are unaware, 90% of the time its cloudy and rainy, so creating cloud cover, is a joke.
-
-
still thinking
Maybe the chemtrails have more to do with weather control than anything else...
Weather control and law
[edit] US and Canada agreement
In 1975, the US and Canada entered into an agreement under the auspices of the United Nations for the exchange of information on weather modification activity. [ 18 ]
[edit] 1977 UN Environmental Modification Convention
Main article: Environmental Modification Convention
Weather control, particularly hostile weather warfare, was addressed by the "United Nations General Assembly Resolution 31/72, TIAS 9614 Convention [ 19 ] on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques" was adopted. The Convention was: Signed in Geneva May 18, 1977; Entered into force October 5, 1978; Ratification by U.S. President December 13, 1979; U.S. ratification deposited at New York January 17, 1980. [ 20 ]
[edit] US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
In the US, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration regulates weather control projects, under authority of Public Law 205 of the 92nd Congress.
[edit] US Legislation
The Space Preservation Act was proposed "to preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States, and to require the President to take action to adopt and implement a world treaty banning space-based weapons." [ 21 ]
2005 U.S. Senate Bill 517 and U.S. House Bill 2995 U.S. Senate Bill 517 [ 22 ] and U.S. House Bill 2995 [ 23 ] were two bills proposed in 2005 that would have expanded experimental weather modification, to establish a Weather Modification Operations and Research Board, and implemented a national weather modification policy. Neither were made into law. Former Texas State SenatorJohn N. Leedom was the key lobbyist on behalf of the weather modification bills.
2007 U.S. Senate Bill 1807 & U.S. House Bill 3445 Senate Bill 1807 and House Bill 3445, identical bills introduced July 17, 2007, proposed to establish a Weather Mitigation Advisory and Research Board to fund weather modification research [ 24 ] [ 25 ]
[edit] Cloud seeding for rain
Cloud seeding is a common technique to enhance precipitation. Evidence on its safety is strong, but there are still doubts about its effectiveness. Cloud seeding entails spraying small particles (like silver iodide) into the sky in order to trigger cloud formation. The hope is that the water vapor already in the air will condense onto the particles, forming clouds and eventually falling as rain. It is, of course, impossible to generate water through cloud seeding; cloud seeding only works to the extent that there is already water vapor present in the air. The principal goal is just to force precipitation to fall in one area instead of another. Critics generally contend that claimed successes occur in conditions which were going to rain anyway. It is used in a variety of drought-prone countries, including the United States, the People's Republic of China, India, and Russia. In the People's Republic of China there is a perceived dependency upon it in dry regions. In the United States, dry ice or silver iodide may be injected into a cloud by aircraft, or from the ground. In mountainous areas of the United States such as the Rocky Mountains and Sierra Nevada, [ 8 ] it has been employed for several decades.
-
482
Chemtrails, Seeing is believing.
by pedal power inbefore i begin, i want you to know i understand the difference between chemtrails and contrails, so lets leave those discussions behind, chemtrails exist.. what is the purpose of chemtrails ?
if it was to artificially create clouds, why come to edinburgh ?
for any of you who are unaware, 90% of the time its cloudy and rainy, so creating cloud cover, is a joke.
-
-
still thinking
My partners parents live in Australia...they have been concerned about the chemtrails for years. It is not a new phenomenon.
Good grief, the government in England has even admitted to spraying chemicals in these chemtrails....and people still deny...
-
482
Chemtrails, Seeing is believing.
by pedal power inbefore i begin, i want you to know i understand the difference between chemtrails and contrails, so lets leave those discussions behind, chemtrails exist.. what is the purpose of chemtrails ?
if it was to artificially create clouds, why come to edinburgh ?
for any of you who are unaware, 90% of the time its cloudy and rainy, so creating cloud cover, is a joke.
-
-
still thinking
The Australian painted apple moth was first found in 1999 in Glendene, West Auckland, and began to spread through West Auckland from Avondale to Titirangi.
The apple moth eats everything from pine to kowhai and fruit trees with the ability to cause tens of millions of dollars worth of damage.
October 20 2001 West Aucklanders say they fear for their health if Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry officials push ahead with a bid for aerial spraying to get rid of the apple moth. MAF orders $5 million of pesticide for its eradication.
October 23 MAF gets approval for the aerial spray programme.
November 11 Biosecurity Minister Jim Sutton intervenes to allow aerial spraying after MAF's plans to start an aerial spraying programme were stalled by the local council's district plan which prevented low-flying aircraft.
January 18 2002 Around 50 people hold a last-ditch protest rally against the spraying outside MAF's Operational Spray Headquarters in Henderson.
February Moth spraying begins after being hampered on numerous occasions due to bad weather.
April 23 MAF claims aerial spraying is reducing the painted apple moth in West Auckland.
September 10 Some residents in Waitakere are up in arms over continued spraying aimed at controlling the painted apple moth. More than 160,000 Aucklanders will be in a new, expanded spray zone.
September 15 The Painted Apple Moth Advisory Group monitoring the aerial spraying wants more talks with the MAF before a bigger programme gets underway. It says there has not been enough consultation on the possible health effects of spray drift and penetration.
October 5 Up to 80 people protest outside the Prime Minister's Auckland home against the aerial spraying campaign.
October 12Hundreds join a protest march in West Auckland over the painted apple moth spraying programme which is set to resume on 40,000 homes.
MAF says the spray is safe and crucial if New Zealand is to protect its forestry and fruit industry from. However, it reveals its staff do not know what is in the spray. Four scientists and medical officers of health are nominated to hold this information due to confidentiality agreements with the chemical manufacturer.
The Greens claim they have a list of ingredients from Canada showing for the first time what may be in Foray 48b, a component of the spray. They say chemicals include benzoic acid and butylated hydroxy toluene.
November 7 Flight paths to eradicate the apple moth in Auckland have been changed following community concern. The change means planes spray over certain suburbs for a shorter period of time.
March 11 2003 Waitakere City Council says it will not take legal action to stop the aerial spraying. The council gathered evidence from residents claiming the spraying is making them sick, but it says the symptoms are not sufficiently injurious to health under the Health Act to warrant legal action.
March 14An Auckland University study finds that aerial spraying has coincided with a sharp rise in some medical problems. Researchers found that in the most intensively sprayed area there was a significant increase in sleep problems, stomach complaints and diarrhoea.
March 22 2006A people's inquiry into the aerial spraying begins. Seventy people testify over the programme which lasted 29 months. Those testifying say they have suffered from nose bleeds, rashes and toxic poisoning from the spraying.
November 2007 Opponents of the aerial spraying call for changes to the Biosecurity Act as findings of a people's inquiry are released. A number of people complained of health problems after the spraying.
December 12 2007The ombudsman releases a report critical of the way the potential health risks from the spraying were communicated to residents and how the ingredients of the spray were kept secret from the public.
-
482
Chemtrails, Seeing is believing.
by pedal power inbefore i begin, i want you to know i understand the difference between chemtrails and contrails, so lets leave those discussions behind, chemtrails exist.. what is the purpose of chemtrails ?
if it was to artificially create clouds, why come to edinburgh ?
for any of you who are unaware, 90% of the time its cloudy and rainy, so creating cloud cover, is a joke.
-
-
still thinking
This is one of the sprays that was used in Auckland...it was used here in Dec 1997 in a field trial of aprox 10,000 people in India.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9699421
Don't they just love to use humans as guniea pigs?
Here are the other two sprays that were used first....
Lorsban 50 ...very toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long term adverse effects in the aquatic environment....guess what? Auckland is surrounded by sea. Fabulous.
Chlorpyrifos is an organophosphate, with potential for both acute toxicity at larger amounts and neurological effects in fetuses and children even at very small amounts. For acute effects, the EPA classifies chlorpyrifos as Class II: moderately toxic. Recent research indicates that children exposed to chlorpyrifos while in the womb have an increased risk of delays in mental and motor development at age 3 and an increased occurrence of pervasive developmental disorders such as ADHD. [15] An earlier study demonstrated a correlation between prenatal chlorpyrifos exposure and lower weight and smaller head circumference at birth. [16]
A 2010 study found that each 10-fold increase in urinary concentration of organophosphate metabolites was associated with a 55% to 72% increase in the odds of ADHD in children. [17]
Studies have shown evidence of "deficits in Working Memory Index and Full-Scale IQ as a function of prenatal CPF exposure [as measured when the children reach] 7 years of age." [18]
The oral LD50 for chlorpyrifos in experimental animals is 32 to 1000 mg/kg. The dermal LD50 in rats is greater than 2000 mg/kg and 1000 to 2000 mg/kg in rabbits. The 4-hour inhalation LC50 for chlorpyrifos in rats is greater than 200 mg/m3. [19]
Chlorpyrifos poisoning has been described by New Zealand scientists as the likely cause of death of several tourists in Thailand who developed myocarditis in 2011. [20] [21] [22] Thai investigators have come to no conclusion as to what caused the deaths, [23] but maintain that chlorpyrifos was not responsible, and that the deaths were not linked. [24]
A 2011 study on the neurotoxic effects of chlorpyrifos showed that chlorpyrifos and its more toxic metabolite, chlorpyrifos oxon, altered firing rates in the locus coeruleus. These results indicate that the pesticide may be involved in Gulf War Syndrome and other neurodegenerative disorders. [25]
This is what they sprayed us with in Auckland in 2002.
-
482
Chemtrails, Seeing is believing.
by pedal power inbefore i begin, i want you to know i understand the difference between chemtrails and contrails, so lets leave those discussions behind, chemtrails exist.. what is the purpose of chemtrails ?
if it was to artificially create clouds, why come to edinburgh ?
for any of you who are unaware, 90% of the time its cloudy and rainy, so creating cloud cover, is a joke.
-
-
still thinking
Even when the government comes out and admits that they have been spraying chemicals on human populations people don't want to hear it. Denial makes it go away.
We had our local government openly spray the population in Auckland because of the apperance of the painted apple moth. They continued spraying the population for months and months every few weeks. They advised teachers to keep children indoors while spraying and for people who have health problems to also stay indoors. My home was a km or so outside the spray zone but it still effected us drastically.
Numerous reports were made about health problems caused by the spraying...protests were organised. Aucklanders were not happy about being sprayed with chemicals....the local government DID NOT CARE. Insect populations disappered for years after the spraying. I didn't see a bee for the longest time. Flys weren't a problem for at least 2 years. Butterflies and other insects just vanished....but the painted apple moth just kept spreading. As far as I know the spraying was ineffective. But for some reason we no longer hear about the painted apple moth being a problem any more. The problem that was soooo bad our local govt. had no other option but to endanger our lives with aerial spraying just vanished over night.
Many Aucklanders ask themselves "what was the point of the spraying?"...."what were they really doing to us?"...they certainly didn't care a jot for our health.
If our local government is capable of doing something like this openly and getting away with it...you have to ask the question...what the hell do they do behind our backs?
-
193
Songs that touch ...
by talesin incan be mushy ... .
or can be craaazyyy ... .
okay, i'll start :).
-
-
still thinking
You know me....I'm NEVER ugly.......just need the sleep...hee hee.....xoxox
Pucker up baby xxxxx
-
193
Songs that touch ...
by talesin incan be mushy ... .
or can be craaazyyy ... .
okay, i'll start :).
-
-
still thinking
Well....I'm off now...get some zzzzzzzzzzz's ....plus my computer is going INCREDIBLY slow and driving my nuts...so many more songs I want to put on but can get this blasted thing to do it quick enough....seeeeee ewe sizey babe I enjoyed your music selection emmensely
-
193
Songs that touch ...
by talesin incan be mushy ... .
or can be craaazyyy ... .
okay, i'll start :).
-
-
still thinking
Nice...how about this?
